Carolyn totally re-purposed an excerpt from her December 23 Christmas chat in today’s (or really, tomorrow’s) column. She does this pretty regularly, expanding upon questions answered on the fly in her live chat by formalizing them in her column…used to bug me (I’ve already read this!), doesn’t anymore.
But this one? This was explicitly about driving from one parents’ house to another for Christmas. I even already blogged about it! She’s simply replaced the word “holiday” with “visiting” throughout:
Any tips for surviving driving my sister from one parent’s house to the other this weekend? It’s a three-hour trip and she commandeers my radio, criticizes my driving, and generally drives me nuts every time we’re in the car. Plus, she’ll be really late, and want to stop at every Starbucks we pass, which will make her have to pee. I’m anticipating the three-hour drive will take roughly 4.5 with her in the car. How do I do it so we arrive at parent No. 2’s house with me still in the visiting spirit?
Read this, appreciate how funny it is, and treat yourself to a foofy somethingorother-uccino at one (if not all) of the stops.
This is all fine, I suppose. This doesn’t really have to be a holiday issue. Though it was way funnier when it was, and mixed in with the context of everyone else’s family disasters.
I guess I just don’t see the point. It’s one thing when a complicated proble requires a nuanced, complex answer, and truly benefits from a more intensive treatment in the column than Carolyn can spare in the live chat. I’ve seen examples like this before.
But this one is clearly for entertainment only. She doesn’t have much to say about it. And it was funnier with Santa hats and eggnog in the landscape. With the number of letters Carolyn surely receives each day, I guess I just don’t get why she bothered to revive this one, which already had its moment back in December.